The question of the case history: The illegality in violation of rules and regulations is great and different

The question of the case history: The illegality in violation of rules and regulations is great and different
"While hearing the medical dispute case, most basic putting materials to the proof is the case history. But questions about the case history are the most, let people have a headache most. " A few days ago, in it is held in association and organization of Chinese hospital medical dispute case about case history problem seminars relevant at, the intersection of Beijing and the intersection of Haidian and what Yong said Wen, judge of district people's court, have caused the sympathetic response of judge, case administrative staff, medical person in charge of appraisal organization and relevant personnel of Ministry of Public Health of hospital present.
"Have never expected that there is information asymmetry between hospital and court. This seminar reaches a common understanding at least - -A in violation of rules and regulations one might not break the law, it is might not right away legal either to be standardized. This is not very clear before me. " A hospital representative participating in the conference expresses after the meeting.
The case history is revised: Standardized may break the law too
"In the medical dispute case, some patients think that there is trace or case history revised in altering, abridgement,etc. that record in the case history that the medical organization offers that there are flaws, thus deny the authenticity of the case history. " Professional committee managing Vice Chairman Zheng XueQian says association's medical legal system of Chinese hospital.
XueQian Zheng invoke, begin new edition that carry out will it be March this year " the case history write the basic norm " article 7: "Case history write in the course appearing wrongly written charactering, should paint with double-line in the wrongly written character, keep, record clearly, can distinguish originally, and mark out, revise time, fix people and sign. Can't adopt the method of shaving, glueing, scribbling etc. to conceal or remove the original writing. The medical workers of higher authorities examine the responsibility which revises the case history that the subordinate medical worker wrote. "
"Since this " norm " defines how to revise the case history, prove the case history can be revised. But while facing a charge in court, why will the hospital be often in the unfavorable, passive position? " Zheng XueQian throws and goes wrong at first.
As to this, many judges participating in the conference think unanimously, while trying, what judicial personnel paid close attention to the fact even more is that case history is finally " revised " , "distort" (used after a verb to indicate the completion of an action).
"If is fine specific wrongly written character, wrong character, neglecting the little flaw caused is revised to treating and curing, incline to approve the case history is as the true validity of the evidence; If the case history has causality while changing some effects to the judgement of the whole course of making a diagnosis, damaging the consequence with the patient, the court will seldom regard this part of case histories as and implement the behavioral evidence of correct medical treatment. " Judge of Xicheng District of Beijing people's court Zhao Chang has discussed one's own experience of handling a case newly.
Zhao Chang further says newly: "Revise the case history, even accord with the norm, so long as have absolute influence on course of disease, treatment, the hospital will explain, put this to the proof soon. , or not, we pay close attention to revising some compared with the intersection of person who fix and norm to the course of disease, therapeutic influence even more. "

|